Former Miss Universe Gloria Diaz recently made headlines for her controversial statements about transwomen, married women, and single mothers joining the pageant. In an interview with showbiz platform Push, Diaz stated that she believes these women should establish their own pageants instead of joining Miss Universe.
Diaz argued that the pageant’s name should be changed to “Universe” instead of “Miss,” as it no longer solely represents single women. She suggested that separate pageants should be created for married women, women with children, and queer candidates, such as “Mrs. Universe,” “Lesbian Universe,” and “Tr*nny Universe.” Diaz stressed that there is “room for so much” in pageantry and that these groups should have their own categories.
The seasoned actress also expressed her reservations about waiving age limits in pageantry, noting that during her time as Miss Universe in 1969, 23-year-old candidates were already considered to be the “oldest.” Diaz argued that waiving age limits is a “very new” idea in pageantry and may not be acceptable to everyone.
Diaz also pointed out that it’s “more difficult” for cis women to compete with transwomen in pageants, based on her experience as a judge in “Sireyna” pageants. However, Diaz clarified that she’s not “homophobic” and that she “loves” the LGBTQ community.
Despite her controversial stance, Diaz stated that she would “accept” the decision of the Miss Universe organizers if a transwoman, married woman, or mother were to win the pageant in the future.
It’s worth noting that the Miss Universe Organization (MUO) has already allowed transgender women to compete in its pageants since 2012. In September 2021, the Miss Universe Philippines Organization (MUPh) also adjusted the age requirement for aspiring candidates, allowing those aged 18 to 28 to join the national pageant. In September 2022, the MUO president Paula Shugart confirmed that married women and delegates with children would also be given a chance to join Miss Universe starting on its 72nd edition.
Diaz’s statements have sparked mixed reactions from the public. Some have criticized her for being exclusionary and outdated, while others have supported her views on creating separate pageants for different groups. Diaz’s opinions also highlight the ongoing debates and discussions surrounding beauty pageants and their evolving standards of inclusion and diversity.
In conclusion, while Diaz’s views may be controversial, they highlight the need for ongoing discussions about inclusion and diversity in beauty pageants. While it remains to be seen how the pageant industry will continue to evolve, it’s clear that these conversations will continue to shape its future.
